The chairman of Thailand’s official human rights body, Saneh Chamarik (above), on July 29 sent an open letter to the head of the United Nations expressing his agency’s most serious concern and dismay at a “blatant violation of human rights.”
As the writing of an open letter to the U.N. secretary-general is an unusual step for a statutory rights bureau, and given its strident tone, readers might expect that its topic would be one of utmost importance to the defense of human dignity in Thailand.
This would be mistaken. The purpose of the National Human Rights Commission’s letter was in actuality to lay blame for a puerile spat over an historic temple between the governments of Thailand and Cambodia with a U.N. committee.
According to Saneh, it is the World Heritage Committee, rather than politicking and self-interested nationalist leaders, that has somehow “endangered the lives of those who live along the Thai-Cambodian border.”
But Saneh does not stop there. He goes beyond any pretence of concern for the integrity of people residing nearby the contested site to lobby unashamedly for his own country’s claims.
“It seems that the views of the Thai side have been consistently overlooked,” he shrills, before concluding with a demand for an inquiry of some sort or another.
Official politeness will oblige a response, but it is hard to imagine the letter being received in New York with anything other than incredulity.
Although the National Human Rights Commission of Thailand has had its share of ups and downs and is certainly not alone among its peers in Asia in having missed the point of its work from time to time, other blunders pale in comparison to the disgrace caused with this outburst. Continue reading
Posted in human rights, human rights groups, other countries, politics, Thailand, UN, UPI
Tagged Cambodia, National Human Rights Commission, NHRC, Paris Principles, Preah Vihear, Saneh, Saneh Chamarik, Sri Lanka, World Heritage Committee
An article in the Asia Times this week linked a secret U.S. facility in eastern Thailand with the torture of people in the country’s south. According to Shawn W. Crispin, “Rights advocates monitoring southern Thailand’s conflict note a striking similarity between the torture techniques U.S. agents are known to have used against terror suspects … with those now in practice by Thai security forces against suspected Thai Muslim militants.”
That soldiers, paramilitaries and police in the south routinely torture their detainees is beyond doubt. Journalists, lawyers and human rights defenders have documented hundreds of cases over a number of years, although concerns for the safety of the victims, their families and persons recording their stories mean that many cannot be publicized. As the abused persons also hold no hopes of redress through the courts, they can expect no more than a small payoff in acknowledgment of wrongdoing with which, it is understood, their silence also is bought.
But have rights advocates really noted a “striking similarity” between these cases and what has gone on in Guantanamo? Isn’t it more relevant to talk about the striking similarity between the abuses in the south and what goes on in police stations all around the country? Or how about what goes on in the Philippines, Sri Lanka or Cambodia? Continue reading
Posted in army, courts, crime, human rights, human rights groups, journalism, military, other countries, police, rule of law, Thailand, torture, UPI
Tagged AHRC, Asia Times, Asian Human Rights Commission, Cambodia, Crispin, Philippines, Shawn W. Crispin, Sri Lanka, Thai Muslim, United States, US